tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-581197352358126527.post417270626879872438..comments2024-03-15T00:22:38.955-07:00Comments on japh(r) by Chris Strom: Show Me the NumbersAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00135361916531185929noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-581197352358126527.post-24106111741984332082009-08-21T12:52:15.940-07:002009-08-21T12:52:15.940-07:00Ah, good point re: haproxy vs. nginx -- I hadn'...Ah, good point re: haproxy vs. nginx -- I hadn't given that much thought, but makes sense. I am using the stock haproxy from debian testing (version 1.3.18-1), not 1.4-dev, so there was no added benefit from that.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00135361916531185929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-581197352358126527.post-14920358312581246612009-08-21T12:28:31.353-07:002009-08-21T12:28:31.353-07:00Well, to be fair, at such extremely low loads, the...Well, to be fair, at such extremely low loads, the difference cannot be caused by haproxy or nginx, both of which have been running below 0.1% of their respective capacities. So the difference comes from the other two :-)<br /><br />However, over a small link, haproxy-1.4-dev may get an advantage because it is able to reduce the number of TCP packets per session, which in turn reduces overall latency.Willy Tarreauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10872713941638092663noreply@blogger.com